ALLBIRDS × VEJA / J475 / UW MADISON

From brand research
to creative direction.

I evaluated AI recommendations, corrected gaps in brand and audience context, and directed revisions to Allbirds messaging and digital concepts.

MY CONTRIBUTION

Brand context. Detailed prompts. Critical feedback. Visual direction.

Academic team projects in AI and Strategic Communications. The work below connects related assignments, each with its own brief and tools.

Strategic promptingAudience strategyCreative directionAI evaluation

01 / RATIONAL AND EMOTIONAL MESSAGING

The difference is
in the direction.

The first concept communicated comfort, but its visual treatment felt too generic for the brand direction I wanted. I supplied more specific brand and audience context and used follow up prompts to refine the website and social concepts.

BEFORE

Initial AI concept

Initial Allbirds AI concept: separate website and social layouts in neutral colors with walking, comfort, and trial messaging.

Separate image and text blocks, neutral colors, and a conventional product layout.

View initial concept ↗
AFTER

Revised after my direction

Revised Allbirds AI concept: larger lifestyle imagery, warm rust colored shoes, and drawn accents connecting website and social concepts.

Larger lifestyle imagery, a consistent footwear palette, and drawn accents connecting the executions.

View revised concept ↗

Original classroom concept images produced with Perplexity, shown as submitted. Small generated text still needs production cleanup. These are student concepts, not Allbirds advertisements.

VISUAL DIRECTION

Make everyday walking visible.

The revision gives movement and daily life more space, so the product benefit has a recognizable setting.

CONSISTENCY

Connect the website and social creative.

Rust colored shoes, warm photography, and drawn accents give the concepts a shared visual language.

MESSAGE STRUCTURE

Pair reassurance with a practical reason to try.

Both versions include comfort and trial messaging. The revision brings those ideas into a more cohesive presentation.

How I evaluated the tools

Perplexity: In our exercise, detailed feedback improved the output, but the tool needed help capturing the brand voice and avoiding an overly strategic tone.

Gemini: Our team found the messaging repetitive and less responsive to creative feedback. These observations describe this assignment, not a universal ranking.

I also asked Perplexity to turn my instructions into a checklist and review its response against the brief. I then pushed it to explain why the message would matter to the persona. Its self review helped structure revisions; I still decided what to keep.

02 / DILEMMA AND SOLUTIONS

I changed the brief
when the answer missed the brand.

This assignment used ChatGPT and Claude to connect an audience problem to a dilemma, a solution, and an observable behavior. My documented prompts show how I pushed the strategy beyond a broad sustainability message.

01

Start with what makes the audience hesitate.

We explored two personas: a consumer skeptical of sustainability claims and a practical buyer concerned about comfort, durability, and price. Different concerns called for different reasons to act.

02

Reject the recommendation that overlooks the positioning.

ChatGPT suggested making carbon footprint the main purchase metric. I redirected it toward the everyday walking, comfort, and style positioning I had observed in Allbirds’ social content.

Connect the sustainability mission to Allbirds’ everyday walking campaign, while keeping comfort and modern style central to the solution.

Condensed from my documented third solution prompt.

03

Connect the campaign idea to the consumer’s concern.

The revised response proposed “Walk the Future,” a platform connecting everyday walking with sustainability participation. I followed up by asking how it would address skepticism, give consumers a reason to stay loyal, and explain the production practices behind the product.

What changed: the idea connected to a specific brand behavior and a specific audience dilemma.

04

Define what would need to be tested.

We explored completed purchases, product retention after a trial, and repeat purchases as possible evaluation measures. Those behaviors would need customer research to explain why they changed.

The platform was proposed, not built or launched. AI suggestions about environmental impact, guarantees, and performance targets would require verification before use.

What comparing ChatGPT and Claude taught us

Our team found that ChatGPT required repeated redirection to produce a focused campaign idea. Claude supplied more detailed tactics and measurement suggestions. Detail made the recommendations easier to evaluate, but did not establish that the suggested numbers or assumptions were valid.

I learned to ask for the reasoning behind a recommendation, connect it to the audience, and separate a plausible proposal from evidence.

03 / THE ALLBIRDS AND VEJA COMPETITIVE AUDIT

Use research to give
the creative work a purpose.

In a separate team assignment, we completed a competitive audit and a 12 slide presentation within two class days. We reviewed websites, news, social content, earned media, and promotional materials to identify communication opportunities.

ALLBIRDS / OUR INTERPRETATION

Everyday comfort and accessible sustainability.

We connected the selected materials to natural materials, walking routines, and everyday wearability.

VEJA / OUR INTERPRETATION

Transparency and fashion credibility.

We connected the selected materials to production transparency, ethical sourcing, and restrained editorial imagery.

Our judgment changed what made it into the audit.

Ground the comparison.

We redirected broad social media answers to the screenshots we supplied, keeping conclusions tied to the actual sample.

Restore missing context.

We supplemented transcripts with observations of visuals and sound, so the analysis could account for how the content worked.

Challenge favorable summaries.

We supplied critical coverage that ChatGPT had missed, then considered what that tension meant for brand communication.

The audit led to proposed creative directions around everyday ease and versatility. It supplied reasons for a recommendation, rather than a list of brand descriptions.

04 / WHAT THE WORK PRODUCED

A strategy I could explain.
Revisions I could show.

Documented decisions

Prompt revisions and tool evaluations record how we challenged the outputs and refined the direction.

Creative concepts

Website and social concepts make the changes to visual direction and messaging visible.

Research and next steps

A competitive presentation and proposed evaluation measures connect the creative ideas to questions a team could investigate.

I can bring a team more than an AI generated first draft. I can define the brief, identify where the output misses it, and direct revisions with a clear reason for each choice.

Academic outcomes only. The concepts were not commissioned or tested by Allbirds or VEJA. No sales lift, conversion improvement, or measured time savings is claimed.

Course, team, and source materials

Course: J475, AI and Strategic Communications, UW Madison. The coursework explored AI tools alongside human judgment, strategic communication, and creative direction.

Team: Xitllali De La Torre Sanchez, Mia Fairbairn, Sam Holle, Rachael Neufeld, and Abigail Wanta. Individual contributions are identified in the first person; team findings use “we.”

Sources: Competitive Assessment Appendix; Allbirds and VEJA summaries; AI Assisted Allbirds Analysis presentation; Dilemma and Solutions prompt record and evaluation; Emotional and Rational Messaging reflection; Evaluation of Rational and Emotional Messaging presentation.

The visual comparison comes from slides 3 and 4 of the messaging presentation. The strategy prompt example comes from the separate Dilemma and Solutions document. The two class day timeline applies only to the competitive audit.